Security? What security?!

We've just got back from a nice 5 day break in London, seeing a few places never visited before, doing loads of walking and exploring and eating at places we don't get to eat at back home. We had originally booked to stay around the corner from Paddington Station, in Sussex Gardens, just off the Edgware Road, as we've stayed in that area several times before but this had to change when we saw the room…  We'd booked into the Castleton Hotel as the one we normally stay in, just a few doors up, was fully booked.  On arriving we found that the room we had been allocated wasn't big enough to swing a cat in, had one of those awful 'pod' rooms for a bathroom and the air-con was not functioning.  The window also only opened 3″ at max – for “safety” reasons, apparently. As it was about 26C in London that day we were less than impressed in seeing what we'd been allocated, especially as we'd already asked when booking for a room on the first floor with a better sized room.   We decided to cancel at the Castleton and try out the Hilton Metropole at the top of the road, where we have also stayed several times before.  Luckily the Hilton had a spare room so we started to pay by credit card…. “Do you have any photo ID?”, we were both asked. “Ummm no, driving license at home, no passport as we don't need one here” “We can't let you in if you don't have photo ID” “What? We have a Hilton Honours number as we've been here before so you know who we are – does that help?” “Sorry, hotel policy, you need photo ID – it's for security.” …and so it went on for a few moments as the ludicrous situation unfolded where even though we had been there before at least 4 or 5 times they wouldn't sell us a room. We wandered out of the hotel and wondered what to do next, when Helen suggested ringing them and trying to book online.  She went back into the hotel to get the phone number and was told “You don't need to use your own phone, you can use the red phone to the side of the check-in desks, it's direct to 'reservations'”. So, we called from their red phone, right next to the check in desk.  Used the same credit card we had offered them at check-in desk.  Were asked no other information and booked a room.  We then stepped a few paces to the left, gave them the reference number and checked-in – no request for photo-ID.  How ridiculous!?! We could have picked up a credit card that was lost, phoned up, given that name, booked a room and that was that.  However, if you walk into the hotel and try and book a room you need photo ID. So they stay cost us double what it would have done at the Castleton but at least you get a quality stay at the Hilton and all was resolved in the end. As for their “hotel policy” and “security”, what ridiculous security is that then?!

Our ’88 Mini Designer in MiniWorld magazine

It’s been an interesting year so far for our old 1988 Mini ‘Designer’ Mary Quant limited edition.   A month or so ago we were asked to submit some photos to the Mini Designer Register site (currently ‘Mini of the month’ at bottom of front-page and several photos on other pages) and then the webmistress of that site put us in touch with a journalist for MiniWorld who was doing an article on Mary Quant.

I took a batch of photos, sent them off and heard back the other day that a few had been used on the article which is now in the shops. So, if you see the July edition of MiniWorld you’ll find 4 of my pics on page 117 of our little old Mini – hurrah!

The full set of photos, from which 4 were selected are on Flickr for anyone interested.

Mini 'Designer' - Mary Quant

Found a reason to use Twitter…eventually!

I've held back from using Twitter for ages as I've never had a reason to want to use it.  The thought of seeing banal messages of "I had beans on toast tonight" just didn't give me a burning desire to sign up.  That changed though at the weekend… On Sunday, as previously mentioned, I was at The Gadget Show Live at the NEC.  I took a couple of (rather poor quality) photos on my N95 cameraphone, as I didn't have my Canon with me, and put them on Flickr.  One of the photos was quite amusing of Jason and Suzi and I remembered Jason commenting at the event "I hope this doesn't get onto YouTube".   When I saw how the photo came out I dropped him an email with the link to Flickr – that was the start of the sequence of events. I'd actually created a Twitter account a couple of weeks before, just to reserve the name, but hadn't used it.  I thought it was now a good time to add The Gadget Show presenters onto my Twitter account to see how it all worked. Next I noticed a comment on Twitter from Suzi regarding my photo I'd posted and emailed to Jason.  I assume she must have told him about it.  It had a tinyurl link to my Flickr photo and the comment "ha ha….nice nips!".  Then the hits started coming in… Yesterday the photo had about 1200 hits and today we're up to about another 150-ish.   Jason has linked to it from his blog and there have been about 67 referrers from there also so far. All this, and a few comments back and forth on Twitter has been really enjoyable and it's interesting to see how Twitter works.   I don't see myself posting many comments that are just statements and not replies to other people, as I still feel that saying if I had beans on toast or not is not interesting to anyone,  but I'll see how it goes. The Gadget Show has been one of my favourite shows on TV for a good few years now and seeing the live event at the weekend was great – can't wait until next year!

The Gadget Show Live – 2009

We were up at The Gadget Show Live at the NEC in Birmingham today.  What a great show!  We were fortunate to be on the very front row, right in the middle, during the hour long session from the presenters.  One of the best things seen there was the new Panasonic Viera Z1 Series plasma TV – a picture that has to be seen to be believed.  If I could justify £4k for a TV then this would be the only choice.   I snapped a few photos but apologies for the quality – they are from a Nokia N95 as I didn't have my proper camera with me.

Longing for an art-house cinema around Worcester

There are rarely films on at our local cinemas (Vue & Odeon) in Worcester that I actually want to see – maybe one or two a year that are worth a visit.  That's not to say I don't like films – I love films and that's the problem.  We make good use of our LoveFilm subscription with the huge selection of world cinema and other great movies they have in stock but get frustrated that the two main chain cinemas in the city just churn out the usual brainless fodder that people seem to lap up these days.  These poor examples of film-making are usually advertised by a one-liner from an unknown film reviewer (I won't call them a critic, as they don't) in something like Heat magazine…. On the other hand, if you like hearing/reading reviews from the likes of Mark Kermode and Andrew Collins then it'll often be the case that, when a gem of a film appears, our cinema doesn't show it – instead we get things like "Marley and Me" instead.   Just dig out the Mark Kermode podcast on this if you want a real laugh… One such film we'll probably miss at the cinema, as it won't be shown, is "Låt den rätte komma in" (Let the right one in) – we're going to have to wait for this to come out on DVD now, or make a trip over to Stratford to see it. I'd really like a decent art-house cinema in Worcester, can't see it happening anytime soon though. One quick film recommendation, for anyone intersted is: Bom yeoreum gaeul gyeoul geurigo bom (Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter..and Spring)

Origins of "back-friend"

Sometimes you use words and phrases and don't think anything of them…until someone else asks what on earth you are talking about.   An example of this is “back-friend”.  My family have always used this, from my Dad's side I believe.  I have heard my grandparents use it in the past and my Dad uses it.   Needless to say it's become part of my vocabulary too, but I never though to look at the origin, and always thought everyone knew what it meant. It was my wife (who hails from Buckinghamshire) who stared blankly at me when I used it the first time, years ago, and it was only then that I started to wonder how many people knew what it was and who didn't. So, a quick Google tonight and I found a brief reference to it on “A Dictionary of Slang and Colloqual English Slang and its Analogues“:-
A splinter of skin formed near the roots of the finger-nail.
I'm still not sure how widely this is used; whether it's an old expression or just maybe regional.  Any takers?

Internet Explorer strikes again

Internet Explorer has a way of driving web developers up the wall.  Every version has its own glut of bugs and quirks, some just irritating and some downright bizarre.   It's one of those bizarre ones that I've been looking at over the last few days – specifically in Internet Explorer 7, the major browser of our end users. The screen in question is an editable version (which I can't show due to authentication issues) of this reading list.  When it goes into edit mode a side panel slides in from the right and you get a library of bookmarks that you can drag onto the list in whatever position you want.  You can also drag in a new section or existing items and sections around on the list.  With the complexity of what is going on there were always going to be a few cross-browser issues but one in particular was so severe we had to disable editing in IE until the problem was found and resolved. The symptoms were that when new items or sections were dragged onto a list you'd get a flickering hourglass, CPU usage up to 96% and it would either be unreliable or impossible to drop it in the right place on the list.  If you started off with a new blank list, the first few items would be OK (up to about 4) then the hourglass flicker would start, by the time you got to 7 or 8 it was getting really hard to drop an item and by the time you hit about 10-12 it was impossible to use.  Firefox worked fine and Internet Explorer 8 (RC1, not tried in the newly released full IE8 yet) also worked fine. Several thoughts crossed my mind when first looking into this:  was it my (JavaScript) code, was it one of the third-party libraries being used (Prototype & Scriptaculous) or was it something else?  I certainly didn't imagine at the start that it was just down to the CSS… Once the code and the libraries were ruled out it ended up being a trawl of Google to see what I could find. The first thing uncovered was from a passing comment on Steve Souder's blog post on "Performance Impact of CSS Selectors".  Steve made passing comment to the performance impact on using CSS 'hover' pseudo-selectors.  We were using those on each item on the list to show/hide edit and delete buttons.  So, I removed the hover selectors and there was an improvement but no magic bullet. More digging around ensued and point 41 this list of IE bugs was found.  This was very close to what I was seeing.  A scrolling layer and a problem that maxes the CPU in IE7.   It then became noticeable that in IE7 I was reliably getting the problem at a certain point when dragging items onto the list.  When the number of items dragged over filled the visible space on the scrolling list, the next item dragged would always start to produce the flickering hourglass and CPU peaking.  I also noticed that the vertical scrollbar on the pane was not sizing correctly.  If you scrolled up and down using the scroll-wheel on the mouse the scrollbar would sort itself out and then next item you dragged across would work OK.   Interesting… More Googling later and I found a similar reference on the MSDN.  This described that problem and pointed at a CSS sizing issue causing a problem in IE.  I tidied up the CSS a bit and added a 'min-height' to a few of the selectors and, hey-presto, no flickering hourglass when dragging items across and no strange resizing scrollbar. So, if anyone else gets anything similar to this then I hope this post helps.  It's driven me nuts for a good few days now.   IE always surprises me (by how bad it is), but I never initially thought that some basic CSS could happily cause IE to go into such a bad CPU spike that it could actually crash the browser – amazing! Now that the problem of making it work in IE7 is well on the way to being fixed I now have to improve the performance on large lists (ABF203, above, is a tiny example compared to some we have).  It'll be back to Steve's great work in this field for pointers on this.

Thankyou to ThinkMini !

It's been a busy weekend and it doesn't feel like 5 minutes since Friday evening. On Saturday the old Mini went to ThinkMini in Worcester to be checked over and have the oil changed.   Dave at ThinkMini is a top guy – if you cut him in half he would have “Mini” running through the middle of him.  An amazing source of knowledge, advice and help that shows through in his work – he really knows the cars, both old and new, inside and out.   I think he really enjoyed working on our 'Designer', saying many times that he'd never seen one in such great condition.  Most of his work these days is on the new BMW Minis but he still knows everything there is to know about the old ones.  Thanks Dave, looking forward to the next visit for the next bit of work. Saturday afternoon was watching the football and seeing Man Utd were given a royal spanking by Liverpool, along with corresponding with a couple of people regarding our old Mini possibly being published in “Mini World” mag.   The photos have gone to them, and the article is due for the July edition, released sometime in April (go figure!) – hopefully our car will get a decent mention and some good photos published. Sunday was a day out at the in-laws, with an 190 mile round trip, and I've just sat down to rest.    Can I have another weekend please?

Malvern Mini Show

I had a spur of the moment trip to the Mini show at the Three Counties Showground in Malvern today and what a great show it was.  At least a couple of hundred Minis there (a few modern BMW-crafted imposters but mainly real Minis).  The time spent on restoring, modifying and caring for these cars was as obvious as ever and there were some really stunning examples.   As usual there were slogans in back windows such as “Designed by a Genius, Hand built by Craftsmen, Modifed by a Nutter” and “45 years old and still taking the piss” and vehicles ranged from sympathetically restored to outrageously modified. I caught a lift with my Dad but really should have taken our old '88 'Designer' as it would have fitted in perfectly.  With just over 6000 miles on the clock, owned from new and in totally original condition it would have looked stunning amongst the others.  Next Saturday the old Mini goes to ThinkMini to have a 20 year treat – a full service, tune up and health-check from people who really know what they are doing with Minis, both old and new.  We went out in it last weekend after I spent the best part of the day washing, claying, polishing, waxing and doing the interior.  It looked absolutely mint at the end of it. In August we'll hopefully be taking it to IMM2009 in Birmingham, celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Mini, just a stone's throw away from where they were built for so many years before moving down to Oxford.   My Dad spent many years at Austin/British Leyland/Austin Rover in Longbridge and used to have a new Mini straight off the production line.  I guess the love of these cars runs in the family.